Skip to main content

Voting for Gridlock in Washington: First, Do No Harm

Inauguration Day

Presidential election seasons are always exciting times for Americans. Read the newspaper any day for a reminder of how much we take for granted here. Every four years we have the opportunity to hire, rehire and fire a commander-in-chief. Of course, our system is not perfect, and is often downright maddening. But, most of us would not trade our system for another.

The presidential election year is especially exciting when you can share it with your kids. I cannot calculate or even recall how many dinnertime discussions we had where all of us would debate the issues and evaluate the candidates. It was great fun to watch the kids engage in the electoral process. While I lean toward the political right, I tried to be a fair (and balanced) moderator during these dinnertime debates. My prediction is that 3 of the 5 will be Democrats, 1 will be a Republican (but doesn’t know it yet) and the 5th kid could go either way.

As we know, one’s political affiliations tend to change as one’s life and circumstances change. Folks tend to protect their own interests, and these interests change as they enter different phases of life. College kids, taxpaying parents raising children and senior citizens likely have different political and economic interests and may vote differently. While some folks, such as presidential candidate Ron Paul, have maintained their political views throughout their lives, most of us modify our views over time.

Remember the joke that a conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged?

The 4 remaining GOP presidential candidates all profess to be true conservatives. One is mocked as being a moderate, as if this is a scarlet letter shaming the former Massachusetts governor. Wouldn’t most of us want a president to be moderate? One is accused of espousing a dangerous nihilistic foreign policy. One is referred to as an erratic time bomb. And one is labeled as not ready for prime time.

All four compete as to who would repeal Obamacare the fastest.

“When I take the solemn oath at the Capitol, I will place my left hand on the bible and raise my right hand. And, in that right hand I will be clutching a pen so that the moment after my swearing-in, I can sign the repeal as the Chief Justice who upheld Obamacare looks on.”

Which candidate made this pronouncement?  Don’t bother Googling. I made it up.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare next month. Most of us expect that the core of the plan – the individual mandate – to slip through. However, just because something is legal, doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.

While Romney wants us to accept the inevitability of his nomination, he hasn’t closed the deal. Anything can happen. Who would have predicted that a one term senator from Illinois would prevail over the Hillary Clinton machine to become the Democratic nominee for president?

If President Obama is reelected, which I expect, then brace yourself for Obamacare on steroids. The hope of those like me who think that Obamacare is bad medicine is that the GOP maintains control of Congress. Why would I actively support gridlock? Because as a physician, I subscribe to the principle, Primum non nocere, First, do no harm.

Comments

  1. Good post, keep on going.

    Thanks!
    Prakash
    http://medicalinformationforyou.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary