Skip to main content

Does Pay for Performance Measure Medical Quality?

If you read this blog, then you likely know about the scam known as Pay for Performance (P4P).  This program not only fails to deliver on its stated mission to improve medical quality, but it actually diminishes it.  For a fuller explanation on why this is true, simply insert ‘Pay for Performance’ into this blog’s search box, and grab some Rolaids. 

In short, P4P pays physicians (or hospitals) more if certain benchmarks are met.  More accurately, those who do not achieve these benchmarks are penalized financially.   I do not object to this concept.  Folks who perform at a higher level should be rewarded accordingly.   My objection is that the benchmarks that have been selected are arbitrary and too far removed from true medical quality measurements.  Benchmarks have been chosen that are easy to measure even if these measurements don’t count for much.  In other words, what really counts in medicine, isn’t easy to count or measure.

Medical Quality Measurement Instrument

Consider the following physician vignettes:
  • A surgeon advises against proceeding with surgery as he feels that in 48 hours recovery may begin.
  • A pediatrician makes a series of phone calls to arrange for a social worker to become involved in a challenging home situation.
  • A family physician tells a patient that a CAT scan is not necessary for his condition.
  • An internist recognizes that a patient’s new symptom is a side effect of a recent medication, which he stops.
  • An emergency room physician sees a patient with a cough and notices a suspicious mole on the patient’s back.  He sends the patient to a dermatologist.
  • A gastroenterologist carefully palpates a patient’s abdomen and discovers that the spleen is enlarged.  This begins a path that leads to an unexpected diagnosis. 
  • An internist takes a thorough medical history letting a patient tell his story without rushing him or cutting off his responses. 
  • An oncologist doesn’t advise futile cancer treatment, even though it could be presented to the patient and family in a manner that they would accept it.  
  • A hospitalist communicates all relevant medical information, including unfinished or pending issues, to the internist who will be assuming care of the patient after hospital discharge. 
  • A psychiatrist saves a patient’s life who had contemplated ending it.

These examples illustrate what I think is very high quality medical care.   But, since there is no way to reliably measure them, they don’t count in the Pay for Performance schema.  So instead, the government and insurance companies will measure lots of dumb stuff and then dock us when we don’t measure up.

This has nothing to do about real medical quality, but it has everything do about cost control.  If the P4P enterprise were paid on its performance, they would be out of business.   Shouldn’t they have to be subjected to the same rules that they impose on the medical profession?


Comments

  1. If you want to improve health care in the us there needs to be a system of accountability and currently there is none. You know better than I do that state medical boards are a joke.

    The US medical industry commits more fraud in terms of dollars than all other industries in the entire world combined.

    In spite of the fact that American MDs are the highest paid in the world they still commit the most errors and fraud.

    Let's take medical criminal Rick Scott and Columbia HCA. In spite of a 1.7 BILLION dollar fine Slick Rick waltzed away with his golden parachute and the morons in Florida elected him governor. Rick Scott and former senator Dr Bill Frist should be doing hard time.

    You can't make cockroaches all that accountable by being nice and offering carrots when these guys are on the kickback gravy train.

    Here is how you fix health care.

    1. Start curing diseases.

    2. Make the Hippocratic Oath law

    3. Punish criminal negligence and fraud.

    Do you realize that health care is the only industry that profits more from being incompetent than competent?

    Click Here Medical Industry Steals More Than the Bankers and Kill More Than the Nazi Holocaust

    The fundamental problem is the corporate monetization of disease and human suffering for obscene profit.

    I hope you publish this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your post is spot on, Dr Kirsch.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is only one way out of this mess, and that is for all the physicians in this country to simply refuse to participate in the Obamascheme. If we trust Congress to relieve our medisurance suffering we are fools. I live in a community whose population is primarily geriatric patients. My rheumatologist says he's $250K in debt because Medicare pays so little, my ophthalmologist (large practice of many docs & many offices) says he's barely getting by, my cardiologist (multiple docs; cath center +) says he's only staying in practice because he has three kids in college or else he'd quit, and the only ones making any money at all are the interventional cardiologists and surgeons. This can't go on! Medicare stopped paying for meds, so I had to stop my meds. Where does that leave me? Government health care is genocide, plain and simple. The elderly and chronically ill are being systematically destroyed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so.  The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals.  In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist.  Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings.  Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape.   Private equity (PE) firms have   been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight.   PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale.   While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier.  There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform.  Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele.  It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance.  For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings?  If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits?  The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform.   Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat.   The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families.   Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR).  I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary.  And it’s not a fair fight.  You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine.   I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient.   You must think I am a magician or a savant.   While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago.   (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary