Are GMO Foods Safe?

The nutrition police are at it again. They demand that food products that use genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their processing inform us of this on the product’s label. They argue, not only that consumers have a right to know how their food is prepared, but also that manufacturers should be required to disclose when evil GMOs are utilized. (Keep in mind that most of the food that we consume includes GMOs, a fact likely unknown by most of us.)

Proposed Label For GMO Foods

This labeling demand from the nutritionistas is a little hard for me to swallow.

I don’t want to hear about polling that demonstrates that most American favor mandatory labeling. I guess we cite poll results when they support our views and dismiss them when we don’t. Donald Trump is ahead in every poll. See my point?

There is no scientific evidence that GMOs harm our health. Fear is not evidence. Political correctness is not evidence. Indeed, the Food and Drug Administration requires no GMO labeling as it has concluded that these foods are safe.

What’s at stake here? Just a small trifle called freedom of speech. I don’t think a person or a business should be forced to ‘speak’ just because a vocal constituency demands it, in the absence of any pressing public need for this. Obviously, I support labeling that highlights specific known dangers of a product. If a food item, for example, contains peanuts, then this should appear on the label to protect individuals who have a peanut allergy.

Why should we stop with just GMO labeling? Why not force food companies to include on their labels what cleaning supplies the companies use so the public can be reassured that they are environmentally friendly? Should a coffee shop be mandated to label their coffee as made with tap water because the filtered-water crowd believes this to be toxic? Should vegetables be required to have labels that specify that this product is not organic?

If a consumer wants to know if their Pop Tarts are tainted with GMOs, then he should feel free to call the 1-800 number on the label to inquire.

What if everyone could be forced to label ourselves according to the whims of others? How ‘bout if the nutrition police had to wear the following label:

CAUTION!

I MIGHT BE CONTAGIOUS!

I think this is totally reasonable and reasonable. Maybe this individual is harboring a serious communicable disease and is simply unaware that he is infected. Just because there isn’t a shred of medical evidence behind this, doesn’t mean we can’t mandate a public warning. Absurd? Of course.

There's right to free speech. There's also a right to remain silent. You have no right to make me say what you want to hear.

Comments

Why Most Doctors Choose Employment

Increasingly, physicians today are employed and most of them willingly so. The advantages of this employment model, which I will highlight below, appeal to the current and emerging generations of physicians and medical professionals. In addition, the alternatives to direct employment are scarce, although they do exist. Private practice gastroenterology practices in Cleveland, for example, are increasingly rare sightings. Another practice model is gaining ground rapidly on the medical landscape. Private equity (PE) firms have been purchasing medical practices who are in need of capital and management oversight. PE can provide services efficiently as they may be serving multiple practices and have economies of scale. While these physicians technically have authority over all medical decisions, the PE partners can exert behavioral influences on physicians which can be ethically problematic. For example, if the PE folks reduce non-medical overhead, this may very directly affe

Should Doctors Wear White Coats?

Many professions can be easily identified by their uniforms or state of dress. Consider how easy it is for us to identify a policeman, a judge, a baseball player, a housekeeper, a chef, or a soldier. There must be a reason why so many professions require a uniform. Presumably, it is to create team spirit among colleagues and to communicate a message to the clientele. It certainly doesn’t enhance professional performance. For instance, do we think if a judge ditches the robe and is wearing jeans and a T-shirt, that he or she cannot issue sage rulings? If members of a baseball team showed up dressed in comfortable street clothes, would they commit more errors or achieve fewer hits? The medical profession for most of its existence has had its own uniform. Male doctors donned a shirt and tie and all doctors wore the iconic white coat. The stated reason was that this created an aura of professionalism that inspired confidence in patients and their families. Indeed, even today

Electronic Medical Records vs Physicians: Not a Fair Fight!

Each work day, I enter the chamber of horrors also known as the electronic medical record (EMR). I’ve endured several versions of this torture over the years, monstrosities that were designed more to appeal to the needs of billers and coders than physicians. Make sense? I will admit that my current EMR, called Epic, is more physician-friendly than prior competitors, but it remains a formidable adversary. And it’s not a fair fight. You might be a great chess player, but odds are that you will not vanquish a computer adversary armed with artificial intelligence. I have a competitive advantage over many other physician contestants in the battle of Man vs Machine. I can type well and can do so while maintaining eye contact with the patient. You must think I am a magician or a savant. While this may be true, the birth of my advanced digital skills started decades ago. (As an aside, digital competence is essential for gastroenterologists.) During college, I worked as a secretary

MD Whistleblower

Search This Blog